There is interest to look at the rules for børneattester based in the Umbrella case among the politicians, Ekstra Bladet has spoken with.
It happens in the light of our mention of the fact that it costs a spot on the børneattesten in 20 years for the children and young people who have been convicted of distribution of child pornography in the highly publicized case, which relates to a video with sexual content where a 15-year-old girl and boy is on.
the 20-year-børneattesten – 0 year on straffeattesten
A conviction for the sharing of child pornography material under the criminal code § 235, will be børneattesten:
10 years from final decision
20 years from the final decision.
20 years from the release or by expiration of any period of probation on parole.
head of Section in the Kriminalregisteret Mikael Søgaard stresses that there is no individual discretion in relation to the sentenced person’s age or gerningens content, how long it is.
– It is subject to Kriminalregisterbekendtgørelsen, he says.
the Judgment is deleted only if there is no registered other judgments on the offender in the meantime. Otherwise, delete the judgment for child pornography first, when the new decision has also been deleted.
the Rules for criminal records for public use is basically:
does not Provide a stain – unless it is within a three-year period (before/after) is convicted of something else, which will be stated in the certificate. In that case it would be 10 years from the decision.
10 years
Show more Close
See also: Teen punished in the Umbrella case: Feel convicted as a pedophile
– It is fine that we have these certificates, but they must also be able to be used very operational for employers.
– It must be clear and clearly, if one is convicted of anything with paedophilia. But here is one perhaps more unwittingly come to share something material, like suddenly standing on the børneattesten, says Peter Skaarup, who calls it out of proportion.
Photo: Jens Dresling
’There is no doubt that Umbrellasagen is quite special, and that børnepornobestemmelsen was used in a different way than we have seen so far. Want the minister to update/change to the legislation, meetings of the Left, of course, constructively, up for negotiations’.
She stresses, however, that the Left is very concerned about the victims ‘ legal certainty.
’The girls must live with what has happened in the rest of life, and it can get to fill much more than a spot on a straffeattesten or børneattesten. The stain on the børneattesten disappears, it makes the scars on the victims of the crimes do not’.
She believes that it must have a consequence, but that it makes sense to look at whether the law is properly decorated.
– I think perhaps that we need to look at to get a new set of legislation, which still contains a consequence, but it is not designed to keep children and youth out of future apprenticeships and trænerjob.
– There is no doubt that the children and young people are not pedophiles, but they have done something that is illegal, and they must of course be punished for.
He calls it is quite obvious to see how one can introduce a clause that goes directly on the digital human.
– I would definitely suggest, if it is not something Straffelovrådet must take a position. It is the some new trends we see, and it is therefore quite natural to look at, is it is the real punishment in relation to the offences they have committed, he says.
Here it appears that he has the understanding that it can have a big impact for a young person to have a supply on børneattesten’ both in relation to future job opportunities and leisure activities.
’But our obligation to protect children against sexual violations and abuse weighs very heavily. Børneattestordningen was originally introduced to protect children against sexual violations and abuse, and it is a very important responsibility for society’.
however, He is open to talk about it.
’If political parties want to have a technical review of the issue, so I’m open to it’.
