The last night in Guadalix de la Sierra has been full of emotion, since the second edition of Big Brother DÚO has come to an end this Thursday, February 29. The competition for the 50,000 euro prize ended in a technical tie due to numerous problems in the voting system. This collapse has led to a decision never seen before: there has been no winner.
Despite not reaching record audience numbers and being much shorter than usual – Telecinco did not want to waste time to release the new edition of Supervivientes as soon as possible – the DÚO has given a lot to talk about on social networks, especially in X. On Elon Musk’s platform there have been many comments on the hashtag
The general perception of this edition has not been particularly positive. As happened with the VIP, which ended just before the start of the DUO, the audience has not been able to get hooked on the reality show. But it’s not just that, it’s that users have been very cruel to the program and have described this edition as “the worst in the history of Big Brother.”
The main reason they have given for issuing this resounding judgment is the cast of celebrities who have participated: “It will end up disappearing, it is logical, they don’t do good casting, they put in worn-out contestants with many followers, this no longer has emotion.” Although the latter is not entirely true, since the two votes in the final have been very close.
Despite the equality in percentages, the voting system has also received criticism from the audience. It is no wonder because he has been responsible for the final being postponed until next Sunday. Thus, numerous users have assured on
There are those who have developed a much more elaborate and far-fetched theory about what happened with the votes. Basically, they have assured that the network itself has manipulated the voting system so that it collapses: “Seeing the nonsense that Telecinco is doing with the votes, preventing us from voting throughout the night to declare Asraf the winner.”
But if there is someone who has accumulated a large amount of criticism, it has been Marta Flich. The Valencian presenter does not finish convincing the audience and, in part, they believe that she is one of the culprits that the program is so boring: “Ugh, what a boring ending. Marta Flich is the antithesis of entertainment and television. I feel very sorry for her, but that’s how it is.” Another has assured that, instead of the winner, what interests her most about the end of the reality show is “losing sight of the presenter’s humor.”
