A recent lawsuit filed in New Hampshire challenges a new law that requires proof of U.S. citizenship when registering to vote and photo identification when casting a ballot. The law, signed by Republican Gov. Chris Sununu, is considered one of the most restrictive voting laws in the nation. The lawsuit, filed by the American Civil Liberties Union of New Hampshire on behalf of several organizations and voters, argues that such laws create unconstitutional barriers to voting.
The lawsuit seeks to block enforcement of the law, citing similar cases in other states where proof of citizenship requirements were found to violate federal laws. Under the current law in New Hampshire, voters without photo IDs can sign an affidavit attesting to their identity and provide documentation within seven days. The new law would eliminate these exceptions and require voters to show a passport, birth certificate, or other evidence of citizenship.
Critics of the new law argue that it creates confusion and unnecessary barriers for voters. They emphasize the importance of ensuring that all eligible voters can participate in elections without hindrance. The state attorney general’s office has stated that they will review the complaint and respond accordingly.
While voting by noncitizens is already prohibited in federal elections and most state elections, concerns about illegal voting have been a key focus of Republican campaign messaging. In response to these concerns, Republicans in Washington are pushing for the SAVE Act, which includes a proof-of-citizenship mandate for voters.
Despite the arguments for and against the new law, the ongoing legal battle highlights the importance of protecting voting rights and ensuring that all eligible voters have the opportunity to participate in the democratic process. Stay informed with our newsletter for the latest updates on this developing story.
