Los Angeles County District Attorney Nathan Hochman recently announced his office’s opposition to a motion filed by defense attorneys seeking a retrial for Erik and Lyle Menendez, who are currently serving life sentences for the murders of their parents. The brothers are seeking a new trial through a habeas petition, a legal avenue separate from requests for re-sentencing. Hochman expressed the opinion that the habeas motion should be denied and filed an informal response urging the court to reject it.

The Menendez brothers’ attorneys argued in the petition that they had new evidence to present regarding allegations of sexual abuse by their father, Erik Menendez. However, Hochman cast doubt on this evidence and stated that it was not relevant to the case. This announcement was made by Hochman at a news conference, where he emphasized his stance against granting the brothers a new trial.

Family Members Criticize Hochman’s Remarks

In response to Hochman’s statements, family members supporting the Menendez brothers’ release expressed disappointment and criticized his remarks. The Justice for Erik and Lyle Coalition accused Hochman of disregarding new evidence and discrediting the trauma experienced by the brothers. They highlighted the lasting impact of abuse on victims and argued that it is crucial to consider the psychological effects of abuse in understanding their actions.

The coalition’s statement emphasized the importance of recognizing the role of abuse in shaping individuals’ behavior and the need to acknowledge its long-term consequences. They condemned Hochman’s dismissal of the abuse allegations as dangerous and emphasized the significance of trauma in influencing victims’ actions.

Resentencing Hearing and Release of Video

The news conference held by Hochman also included the release of a video titled “The Anatomy of the Menendez Case,” which aimed to provide insight into the workings of the criminal justice system using the Menendez case as a framework. This video was intended to explain legal proceedings related to the case and shed light on the complexities of the trial.

The announcement of Hochman’s opposition to the habeas petition comes ahead of a re-sentencing hearing scheduled for late March. The recommendation for re-sentencing was made by then-Los Angeles County District Attorney George Gascón, with Hochman stating that he needed time to review the case before proceeding. The brothers, who have been in prison for approximately 35 years, were convicted of first-degree murder in 1996 and sentenced to life without parole after two trials in 1993 and 1995.

A hearing held in November discussed the next steps in the petition for a new sentence, with the brothers appearing via video feed due to technical difficulties. The judge granted additional time for Hochman to review the case and related trial documents, postponing the resentencing hearing to March 20 and 21 at the Van Nuys Courthouse.

The announcement by District Attorney Hochman regarding the opposition to the Menendez brothers’ retrial bid has sparked controversy and criticism from family members and supporters. As the legal proceedings unfold, the debate over the role of abuse in shaping the brothers’ actions continues, with implications for their quest for a new trial. The upcoming resentencing hearing will provide further insight into the complex legal issues surrounding the case and the ongoing efforts to seek justice for all parties involved.