During a recent presidential debate, President Trump accused Democrats of supporting extreme abortion policies, including the execution of babies after birth. However, a fact-check revealed that killing babies after they are born is not legal in any state. While Trump’s accusations may have been exaggerated, there are still concerning issues surrounding abortion policies supported by some Democrats.
For example, Senator Kamala Harris, during her presidential campaign in 2020, opposed legislation that would have required doctors to provide basic care to infants who survive abortions. This neglectful stance on providing care to babies who survive abortions raises questions about the morality of the left’s position on abortion.
Despite arguments that legislation protecting babies who survive abortion attempts is unnecessary because such situations are rare, Governor Walz of Minnesota, who is Harris’s running mate, has taken actions that undermine protections for these vulnerable infants. Walz has overturned laws that prevent coercion into abortions, defunded pregnancy centers, and removed requirements for informed consent, leaving babies who survive abortion attempts without adequate protections.
While Harris may laugh off accusations of supporting extreme abortion policies, the reality is that several states have gestational limits on abortion procedures. Some states even allow abortions in the third trimester or after viability. During a debate, Trump challenged Harris to name a single restriction she supported, but she failed to provide a clear answer, instead focusing on codifying the protections of Roe v. Wade.
It is important to note that Roe v. Wade does not provide enforceable protections for viable babies, as evidenced by cases where healthy babies in the third trimester are terminated. Despite claims that late-term abortions are only sought for maternal health complications or fetal anomalies, studies have shown that the majority of these procedures are not performed for these reasons.
The Women’s Health Protection Act, supported by Democrats, goes beyond codifying Roe v. Wade and would eliminate fetal viability limits and overturn hundreds of state laws, including those banning sex-selective abortions and protecting conscientious objectors. This extreme approach to abortion raises ethical questions and challenges existing laws that aim to protect vulnerable populations.
In conclusion, the debate over abortion policies highlights the need for a nuanced discussion that considers the ethical implications of late-term abortions and the rights of unborn babies. While Democrats may advocate for expansive abortion rights, it is essential to examine the potential consequences of these policies on vulnerable populations and existing laws that aim to protect life.
