After years of progressive acceptance of gender ideology, to the point where many women feel uncomfortable and discriminated against, the United Kingdom has begun not only to put the brakes on, but even to reverse. The latest example is that British public health will reform its constitution to state that “sex is a biological matter”.
Among the changes being considered are banning transgender women and non-binary people from being patients on female-only hospital wards, and recognizing the right of women to request same-sex doctors for issues gynecological
After reaching the zenith, both England and Scotland have taken a step back in making it easier for children and teenagers to change sex, using different (or non-existent) pronouns and adjectives to refer to or targeting non-binary people, and in the environmental goals of reducing the carbon footprint. The first, because of the opposition of a large sector of the public who think that common sense has been lost and language has been distorted, and the absurdity that many politicians do not dare to answer the question of what is a woman, and can she have a penis. The second, because of the cost.
A trans law quite similar to the Spanish one has been an important reason in the fall of the Scottish Prime Minister Humza Yousaf and in the decline in the popularity of the Scottish National Party (SNP, independenceist), after not having understood the enormous opposition it caused in public opinion, and not only among conservative voters, the ease for children and teenagers to change sex. The writer J.K. Rowling, author of the Harry Potter series, has for years been the victim of a campaign of harassment on the networks by the most radical group in the defense of gender ideology, and denounces the radicalization of intellectual circles and academics
The so-called Cass report has marked a turning point after suggesting that British children and teenagers were being prescribed puberty blockers too easily, and recommending that it should only be done in the course of properly supervised clinical trials. The author criticizes that sex change processes begin without an analysis of possible underlying neurological problems, such as autism, or depression.
