Josh Hawley and Lucas Kunce recently went head-to-head in a lively debate at the KTVI/KPLR studios in St. Louis County. The debate covered a variety of important topics, revealing where the candidates stood on key issues. Here are five standout moments from the debate that shed light on their positions.
Credit card and financial issues were the first hot topic of the debate. Hawley expressed his support for capping high credit card interest rates, emphasizing the need to protect people from excessive fees. Kunce, on the other hand, advocated for caps on interest rates for credit cards and payday loans, highlighting the need to prevent exploitation by lending institutions. The candidates’ differing views set the stage for a heated debate on economic struggles and personal wealth.
Abortion rights became a contentious issue as well. Hawley voiced his opposition to Missouri’s Amendment 3 and outlined his stance on reasonable restrictions for abortion. Kunce, in contrast, criticized Hawley’s extreme position on abortion and emphasized his support for codifying Roe v. Wade at the federal level. The debate on abortion quickly escalated, with accusations flying from both sides.
Election results and presidential candidates also sparked a heated exchange between the candidates. Hawley defended his actions regarding the certification of the 2020 U.S. presidential election results, while Kunce accused him of inciting the Capitol riot. The discussion then turned to the candidates’ positions on the upcoming presidential election, revealing their differing approaches to national politics.
Gun control and gun violence were significant topics of discussion as well. Kunce supported real checks on all gun sales and advocated for stricter penalties for violent criminals. Hawley, on the other hand, prioritized cracking down on illegal gun markets and focusing on criminal behavior. The debate on gun control took a personal turn when Hawley brought up an incident at a shooting range involving Kunce.
Lastly, immigration and border security emerged as a key issue in the debate. Hawley called for closing the U.S.-Mexico border entirely and deporting all illegal immigrants. Kunce proposed a more pragmatic approach, focusing on stopping fentanyl trafficking and equipping Border Patrol with necessary resources. The candidates’ contrasting views on immigration reform highlighted the complex nature of the issue.
Overall, the debate between Josh Hawley and Lucas Kunce provided voters with valuable insights into the candidates’ positions on critical issues. As the November general election approaches, voters will have to weigh these differing perspectives to make an informed decision at the polls.
