When the announcement came that celebration officials had elected Tom Perez chair of the Democratic National Committee over Keith Ellison, chants and protests broke out in the back of the area.

“Celebration of the people today, not major cash! Party of the men and women, not large revenue!” a modest, but loud group yelled, standing with their fists in the air. They wore green T-shirts with Ellison’s name and drowned out the speeches onstage.

Ellison, a spirited, African American congressman from the Midwest, was the initial Muslim elected to the Property of Representatives and was an early backer of Sen. Bernie Sanders’s presidential campaign.

In the quick aftermath of the November election, when so a lot of other Democrats remained silent, stunned and shell-shocked, Ellison raised his hand and decided to run to chair the political wing of the Democratic Celebration. Sanders, unions, and main grassroots groups have been with him instantaneously and went to work.

For progressives, electing Ellison to this prime post could be, in way, a silver lining to the otherwise disastrous election. Yes, Donald Trump was president, but maybe now the party would finally listen to them. Folks who felt like they played second fiddle to the powers in Washington and Hillary Clinton’s headquarters in Brooklyn believed this could be their moment.

Even some of the largest celebration insiders, like Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, gave Ellison and the movement he represented a thumb’s up.

Perez’s very first move as chair was a show of reconciliation. He produced Ellison his deputy. The two stood onstage side by side and asked Democrats to perform collectively. They said in a joint press conference that only a unified party could take on President Trump.

During an interview with ABC News’ George Stephanopoulos, Perez stated he and Ellison had “identical values.”

“We have been good friends for a lengthy time. We are united… We want to make certain everyone has a fair shake,” he said on ABC News’ “This Week.”

But is that enough? And how numerous people at house do these nonetheless reeling, angry and chanting protesters represent?

“There is this narrative that Ellison is the candidate of the individuals and Perez is the candidate of the establishment. That is basically the public opinion,” Winnie Wong, founder of People for Bernie, 1 of the most active grassroots groups on the left, stated just after the vote. “And so the outcome in this moment is that the candidate of the establishment when again trumps the will of the individuals.”

Wong takes pride in getting helped generate that very narrative of outsider-versus-insider. They have been supplying the celebration a choice — a likelihood to show symbolically that it was understanding a lesson from the previous and ready to make a major modify.

“You have to have to be party that genuinely understands how to engage persons to participate in the process of democracy,” she said. “They are not learning from the lessons. The establishment and Clinton-ism failed to beat Donald Trump.”

Wong predicts that Perez’s victory could disappoint activists and further disengage them from party politics.

“I just believe people today will have much less optimism and significantly less faith in the process of democracy and this will severely depress voter turnout in 2017 and surely does not bode properly for 2018. It is not basically about a ‘Dem exit,’ it will be a ‘Dem stagnation,'” she stated.

The evening prior to the vote, Bob Bland, a national co-chair of the newly formed but groundbreaking Women’s March organization, mentioned she felt Ellison had the ability to transform the party in a way she, too, felt was desperately required.

“This vote is going to indicate irrespective of whether that transformation is doable and worthy of our time or not,” she said at a reception for Ellison.

Jim Dean, the head of Democracy for America, known as the election final results disappointing and a missed opportunity for the party to “regain relevance.”

“[It] proves, once once more, how out of touch party insiders are with the grassroots movement presently in the streets, on the phone, and at town halls nationwide,” he wrote in a statement.

Adam Green, founder of Progressive Adjust Campaign Committee, said these activists in the streets and progressive organizations will “move on with our lives.”

“The default is that issues continue as they’ve been, which is the DNC operates in its lane and the progressive activist base operates and does what it does,” Green said.

He stated there was still a opportunity for adjust but that it was now up to Perez, whereas with Ellison they would have had an instant in.

“If Perez wants to reach out proactively and attempt to develop bridges among the DNC and the grassroots activist base, that would be listened to,” Green added.

Speaking to ABC News in the hall just after the vote, Jeff Weaver, Sanders’ former campaign manager, seemed to agree with Green that the party could nonetheless make the modifications they believed were needed, but that it would take some operate and some convincing.

“We’re going to have to wait and see. You know, are they seriously going to create a grassroots party? Are they genuinely going to turn to smaller donors? Are they genuinely going to articulate a bold progressive economic agenda? If they do these things, I consider people today will move toward the party. If they don’t, a lot of folks will stroll away,” he stated in an interview.

But hours just after the vote, Weaver took a different approach in an email to a group of the senator’s former supporters. He wrote that it was still up to them to remake the celebration in the image they wanted.

“I’m certain this DNC election has stirred up equivalent feelings to the ones you felt in the course of and immediately after the key. It did for me,” his e mail from the group Our Revolution study. “[Perez] made promises about developing a grassroots celebration. We are going to hold his feet to the fire.”

Our editors found this article on this site using Google and regenerated it for our readers.