In recent days, a new conflict has come to light that directly affects Raquel Bollo. The designer has been in the eye of the hurricane for a few weeks due to the raid suffered in her fashion workshop and, more recently, after starring in a famous moment before the cameras of Sálvame.
Added to these episodes is now the possible loss of her friendship with another television station: Anabel Pantoja. As reported in the Telecinco program, Bollo would be angry with Isabel Pantoja’s niece for not publicly supporting her son Manuel Cortés after being nominated in Survivors 2023 and having to leave the contest for medical reasons. All this has caused viewers to know the true face of the relationship between Raquel and Anabel.
This Friday, a person very close to the Pantoja family has gone live on Sálvame to tell what is behind this disagreement. Laura Cuevas, daughter of the former mayor of Cantora, has assured that the relationship between Anabel and Raquel Bollo is not really good at all. “Anabel first approached Raquel when she wanted to work on Sálvame,” she said, hinting that there was an interested reason behind her.
Gema López reminded Cuevas that both had already starred together in several moments before the cameras, “long before Anabel entered this program”, to which the woman has responded emphatically: “Pure falsehood! Everything that has been there , facing the public is pure falsehood; in Cantora they didn’t even look at each other,” he assured.
Gema has insisted that she has been able to witness first-hand the good relationship between Raquel Bollo and Anabel Pantoja, after Laura Cuevas had already left Cantora. “I have seen them do real favors as friends, and that Raquel puts the stack on many things for Anabel when she did not agree,” said the Sálvame collaborator.
“This is to make Anabel see that she cares about her, that she wants the best for her and everything else! I don’t believe anything at all; what there is is falsehood and pure interest,” Cuevas snapped at her between shouts. “I come to tell, not only my testimony, but that of people who have been there for 34 years and to this day you have not had testimonies like mine,” he concluded to endorse his words.
