Lorenzo Quinn and Giovanna Ciutt are once again in the center of the media spotlight. The couple announced their separation at the beginning of the year after more than 35 years of marriage and three children together. It was the Italian artist himself who announced the breakup with the mother of his children through social networks.

”Life is a journey… our journey as a couple has ended and unfortunately we are in the process of separating, but it is not the end of our lives,” declared Anthony Quinn’s son. But the breakup between the couple has not been as easy as initially expected, since they have ended up starring in an unprecedented judicial war.

This same Tuesday, the Sonsoles Ónega program revealed that it had had exclusive access to the summary of the Quinn family case in which the crossing of accusations between Lorenzo Quinn and Giovanna Ciutt is detailed. On the one hand, it is known that the Italian woman denounced her ex-partner for abuse, both physical and psychological. But Anthony Quinn’s son also filed a lawsuit against his wife in which he accuses her of breaking into her home.

As revealed by journalist Carlos Quílez, Lorenzo Quinn reported that his ex-wife went to his sculpture workshop to completely destroy it. “She was angry, angry and very aggressive, destroying several sculptures and street furniture,” declared the collaborator.

All this discomfort between both parties would have started at the moment in which the existence of a third person came to light, which marked a before and after in the marriage. According to the journalist, it was Lorenzo Quinn who first filed the complaint for trespassing and a week later his ex-wife counterattacked, denouncing him for mistreatment.

Furthermore, the Sonsoles Ónega program was able to speak exclusively with Giovanna Ciutto, who preferred to remain silent and let justice do its job. But journalist Bea Osa revealed that she had been able to speak with the lawyer of the artist’s ex-wife, who recognized that she was upset, but in the workplace and not personally. ”They have a 50/50 company and one day she finds that she wants to access that shared company and she can’t. The locks have been changed. She tries to access it and her lawyer denies that damage, that home invasion. They say that she manages to get in but she doesn’t destroy anything,’ she asserted.