This week a schism has formed in the Campos family. Although in the previous one the separation between José María Almoguera, son of Carmen Borrego, and Paola Olmedo was announced, now they have decided to do an interview together to gut the survivor. Some statements that have been given in Semana magazine and that have not left anyone indifferent.
”My mother disappointed me when she sold our pregnancy (…) If my grandmother had not died, I would still not speak to my mother,” stated the collaborator’s son. Given this, there have been many who have wanted to give their opinion on the matter , among them, Alessandro Lequio.
“We all know Carmen, we know what she is like, but no one, least of all a mother, deserves the unpresentability that her son has committed,” stated the count. Although he has been very critical of his partner on numerous occasions, it seems that this time he has decided to charge against José María Almoguera.
Even so, he is clear that this is going to be good for him in some way. “Carmen is very smart and tonight I think she is going to hide behind her shock to say as little as possible and wait for the right moment with all the euros on the table to respond to her son,” she added.
And the way the son and daughter-in-law act has perplexed the collaborator of Let’s See, who calls the situation “incredible.” “They have just sold an exclusive, to which they have every right in the world, but they do so feeling like victims of their own exclusive,” he stated.
Some statements endorsed by Joaquín Prat, who thinks practically the same thing. “And it is repeated in the case of the pregnancy announcement, because they present themselves as victims of the exclusive that mom makes saying that she is going to be a grandmother when they are beneficiaries of the same,” he added, making it clear that the interview that Carmen Borrego gave It also made them a profit.
And although Alessandro Lequio sides with Terelu Campos’ sister in this sense, his voice has not trembled when it comes to criticizing her contest in Survivors again. And he believes that this will help him leave the reality show as the victim of her son and not “as the worst contestant in history.”
“This lady has done the worst reality show in history. We treat her as a victim, which she is, of her son’s misery. It’s curious. And money can never justify selling a mother. This is a very clear case why “A mother could disinherit her son. This boy has dedicated himself to recounting the miseries of his mother, and by extension his family, for revenge and money,” he added, being very harsh.
