Alessandro Lequio and Ana Obregón have been two of the names most mentioned together in the media, magazines and social gatherings in recent months. The aristocrat and the actress have been at odds since their separation, and the differences have gradually worsened with the death of their son Aless and the birth of Ana Sandra, the deceased’s daughter who came into the world through a much-discussed artificial insemination.

Despite this, Obregón had nothing but good words for the count during his first appearance after the Aless Lequio Foundation controversy this weekend: “I love him very much. Alessandro is the father of my son and we will always be united by our son and by the memory of our son. And out of respect for our son, because what he was most excited about was seeing us together. So I know he’s watching us, they’re together and they’re together. For him and always, always.”

Some words to which Lequio himself responded this Monday morning. The collaborator of several Telecinco programs such as Let’s see, ¡Fiesta! o TardeAR has been intercepted by several reporters with the intention of reacting to Obregón’s statements. However, his response has been calm, diametrically opposed to the comments that usually create more controversy: “We have never been in conflict.”

Precisely, the Italian ruled out any contrary position in his ex-partner’s controversy with donations to the Aless Lequio Foundation. “The foundation’s accounts were those of the foundation, and those of Ana were those of Ana Obregón. I’m not interested in Ana’s at all and those of the foundation are more than clear,” he expressed in Let’s see after the Christmas holidays, when asked about the matter by his fellow collaborators.

“The foundation is a young, humble foundation, with a part-time employee and we are very clear about not wasting any of the foundation’s money because it has a clear purpose (…) It is young, but healthy, with very clear accounts. . Another thing is the commitment that Ana has made publicly every time she made an exclusive (…) I don’t know if she has done it or not,” she added, insisting that the situation of the foundation was correct beyond what was known. was said in the media.

For its part, the entity released a statement to defend itself from the rumors that populated the front pages and gatherings for weeks: “In light of the erroneous and completely untrue news and information that has been happening in recent days through different media, we come to express that the accounts faithfully reflect its economic reality. “They scrupulously comply with the legal requirements of transparency and public deposit.”