the national Association of the Neighbours of Kæmpevindmøller takes sharp distance from Danmarks Radio’s broadcast ’Realitytjek: Ida Auken, and the vindmøllenaboerne’
– Realitytjek’ is a misleading title for this broadcast. It is not vindmøllenaboernes reality, Danmarks Radio reflecting.
There are insufficient factual information about the vindmøllestøj and about the neighbors who have had to leave their now uninhabitable home.
– First of all, we consider the broadcast as an attempt to raise the profile of the person, Ida Auken, Denmark the champion of the current government’s climate and energy policy.
– DR was produced Radical Left’s Ida Auken as the entire country’s vindmølledronning that generously proclaim the message of ‘the big picture’.
– Some need to bring sacrifices, and Ida Auken said it very clearly: ‘I am the representative of all the people who would like to have, that Denmark can lead the world.’
so begins Henriette V from the national Association of the Neighbours of Kæmpevindmøller a letter to Ekstra Bladet that the vindmøllenaboer feel cheated by the Danish Radio – and feel like the extra in a fan-broadcast on Ida Auken.
the national Association of the Neighbours of Kæmpevindmøller is not the only one who has responded to the broadcast ‘Realitytjek: Ida Auken, and the vindmøllenaboerne’. On the DR News Facebook has more than 200 commented on it, and quite many of them also believe that the politician was too much talk and not listened to it, neighbors said.
Henriettes letter – as Ida Auken comments below – continues namely as follows:
– Vindmøllenaboerne assimilated into the DR program with Ida Auken, however, be used, however, only as extras in the DR’s staging of the Ida Auken.
– the Conversation with the neighbors took 90 minutes, but was cut down to a few minutes.
– Ida Auken was however ample opportunity to unfold his personal views, while the neighbors not got a chance to get their message out to the public.
– Information about vindmøllestøj in the broadcast was in our ears misleading, and the displayed text on the screen regarding. opvaskemaskiners the noise was blatantly manipulative.
– You can’t legitimately compare the sound pressure level from the giant wind noise from a household appliance.
– Some of the meeting participants has these comment on their participation:
I feel directly abused. I have only been a extra in the Ida and vindmølleindustriens propagandaspil for the establishment of kæmpevindmøller, helped by DR.
– The serious problems relating to the low-frequency noise and vibrations was elegantly avoided. There was no desire to hear about this, but Ida’s incessant repetition of the noise, when a car drove past, made me angry, for it is NOTHING compared to the genes from kæmpevindmøllerne, running 24/7/52.
– That my two children have sleep problems due to. low-frequency noise, there was also no desire to talk about it, says vindmøllenabo Christine Fredensborg-Fogtmann, who lives 597 metres from the two wind turbines with a height of 149 feet, so.
– It, Ida Auken could not answer, was not shown. We do not have answers to, though she now admits that you can’t stay closer than 900 meters to 150 meters high kæmpevindmølle.
– And what with us who have had to flee from the residence, since we have lived much closer than the 900 metres, says Kaj Bank Olesen and Johnny Solberg – who lives x meters from a wind turbine in the y-town says:
– Unfortunately, they were more detailed questions to the Ida Auken around vindmøllebekendtgørelsen cut out of the program.
– We asked among others, Ida Auken, if she could tell us what the limits were, respectively, 4, 7 and 10 m/s. This she could not answer.
the nation! has asked Ida Auken, to comment on the association and the performers ‘ statements, and answer questions about whether she – after having seen the broadcast, believe that she was given too much talk time. She replies …
– In the course of the two days, where I visited vindmøllenaboer, we had lots of good talk – where everyone was heard.
– How the DR has chosen to cut the program, I have no influence on. I think that both arguments were presented in the program.
– I know there are some who experience major inconveniences by living close to wind turbines.
– Therefore has a very large majority in the Danish Parliament has just agreed new rules, where the closest neighbors are compensated better than in the past and get better opportunities to sell their house.
– You get no compensation for staying close to a pig farm or a large factory, but it makes you as a neighbor to wind turbines or solar cells.
– the Neighbours of wind turbines also have the better rights in relation to the noise than, say, the neighbors to the noise, writes Ida Auken to the nation!, but what are you thinking?
