“The cold war was ideological, the US-China war is technological”

Are you a member of the Chinese Communist Party?

Yes, like more than 100 million Chinese of the 1,400 who live in China today.

Is China going to give arms and support to Putin?

China feels mistreated by this war for two reasons: the first is that it is doing the same as India, which trades with Russia and maintains neutrality; but China is not forgiven for acting like this…

Because?

Because China is already the only one that threatens the sole leadership of the US in the world since the USSR lost the cold war. And blaming China is part of Washington’s post-Cold War strategy.

Is the world already bipolar today?

But except for the United States and China, no one else likes to admit it and feel like a third-rate player. Washington plays to align the world into two blocks and force everyone else to choose one to show that he is still the most powerful and supported.

Why doesn’t China give Putin arms?

Putin is already a loser in this post-cold war, which is no longer the ideological cold war between communists and democrats; this new rivalry is technological. And Putin loses it.

Putin is a loser?

His era is over. In technology Putin is way behind.

Has Russia also lost in ideology?

Washington has also tried to emphasize what it considered its ideological advantage: being the leader of the free world and of democracies, but it has not quite worked for it in Asia.

But yes in Europe.

If Trump were to return to the White House, things would not be so clear, because he disoriented the Europeans: he made them see his submission. And he would once again make it clear that the Europeans are not allies, but mere extras. Biden is more adept at it and spares them that feeling.

Can you tell me the second reason why China feels mistreated about Ukraine?

Because it has had nothing to do with this war that is a problem between Putin, Biden and Ukraine and NATO and its allies. Instead, responsibility is attributed to it precisely to reinforce that bipolarity of the pose that interests Washington.

Why doesn’t Beijing condemn Putin?

Because the US has not stopped selling arms to Taiwan, reinforcing its hostility towards China and questioning Chinese sovereignty over its own waters and territories. Why would he side with someone who harasses him like that? Only that neutrality remains.

Will it go to war with the US?

It is impossible. First, because we are in a transition phase in history and I already told you that world hegemony will not be decided by the most attractive ideology, but by the most powerful technological leader.

Aren’t you afraid of a proxy war (war by proxy) like the USSR-USA Vietnam?

It would not benefit anyone, because it is not about winning proxy wars, but about winning the great global technological battle.

¿TikTok versus Instagram? ¿Google versus Baidu? ¿Apple versus Huawei?

You know these Chinese brands, because Chinese products, commerce, and services are already part of the lives of millions of humans across the planet and that is what has aroused suspicion in the US and the question is: is it? Who can today provide the planet with the cheapest and most accessible technology?

Who wins will have hegemony?

Whoever wins, I assure you, won’t be the one who wins wars like the one in Ukraine, but the war of laboratories, factories and markets.

And this is how the globalization that has made the planet progress until today ends?

Globalization made billionaires out of a cosmopolitan elite and made life somewhat better for everyone else. But globalization is mortally wounded by the rivalry started by the US out of jealousy to see China progress and project itself in the world so quickly.

USA. before it will stop the globalization that will share it?

Globalization has been frozen and will not resume because all countries have been invited by Washington to worry about “national security” at the same time, even if no one knows exactly what it is.

The chip war?

Isolate – they say “contain” – China by penning technology providers in a pen with a very high fence that they cannot access, but that isolates them too: it is the end of global prosperity.

And if China wins that technological war?

Impossible: the country that can attract the most global talent will win, and Chinese universities are no longer capable of attracting it.

Because?

We have fewer and fewer foreign students in China and we only needed the covid to slow us down: it is ridiculous that in China they still ask us for tests. We can’t compete with the US for talent, so you already know who’s going to win.

Exit mobile version