What do you hope to discover now without Stephen Hawking?
I think I will get there and we will get to see how our telescopes find life on exoplanets with an atmosphere…
Why are you so sure?
Because something unique is happening in the world of astrogravity and quantum and that is that the new telescopes and their astrophysicists are crossing data with each other and the surprise is that these data are beginning to converge with the theories of holographic physics… Theories which I second and which Stephen and I proposed.
Can you state them here and now?
Is the universe an immense quantum computer? Is the cosmos a hologram that will one day be deciphered by that computer? Holographic physics puts information at the center of all theory: quantum information and quantum computing… Like Hawking and me.
What do you propose?
Until now we were talking about matter and particles and forces and space-time; but we are getting closer to the conception of the universe evolving to the life that a quantum computer will simulate…
Will the computer be like the universe?
…Which was nothing but a computer. We are seeing new types of intelligence emerge that begin to map the cosmos with machine learning…and they are proving us right: the universe responds to different laws, because it evolved in different layers and in its beginnings it was much simpler: it had no three dimensions, but two…
Has the cosmos been changing and adding dimensions to the two it had?
And we see that the notion of universal and immutable laws of physics for everything that happens in the cosmos from its origin and conceived from the illusion of those who believe themselves outside of it is outdated.
How did Hawking reconcile these laws in continuum with Darwin’s?
Before, a distinction was made between laws of physics and those of biology; but those of Darwin follow those of Hawking to explain the evolution of the universe of which we are part, because the scientist is not a God who deciphers them from beyond, but part of it. He explains how we arise in him.
Are there no universal laws, then?
What we are saying is that the laws of the universe do not seem to change, but it only seems to us that they do not change, because they do not change on the scale of space-time that we are capable of conceiving as humans… But, in reality, they do. they change.
Did you go further?
Hawking was as crazy as the universe itself, which is why he was able to conceive it in retrospect to the big bang and not only in the space-time in which it was…
Do we live in parallel universes?
That is what Linde, Vilenkin or here Garriga propose; But this proposal is not complete nor does it stop being another hypothesis of an external law to the future of the universe itself, which they still try to explain as if they were not in it and it is of no use to us, because we are inside it and we evolve – like its laws – with it.
So how did it all start?
The laws that explain what the cosmos is, and in it, us, since the big bang, are manifesting layer after layer in a constant evolution that leads to life…
Does the observer modify what he observes because it is part of what is observed?
Darwin explains what he observes knowing that it is a primate, ergo part of what was observed; and that is us when describing the evolution of the cosmos; That is why I pay tribute to him with the title of my book.
Where are we going with the universe?
Life evolves and, therefore, so do the laws that describe it. And those of DNA are fulfilled not before DNA existed. The same thing happens with those of the cosmos.
Was the cosmos simpler in origin?
And it must be understood that the laws that explain it also evolve with a random point, like the evolution of life itself. Because there is nothing predetermined: evolution sometimes depends on chance and only then can we explain why it has evolved in one direction and not another. It has no direction or meaning predetermined by anything or anyone.
How to know here and now what happened?
I hope that they will reveal it to us with the new telescopes by observing those gravitational waves that come to us from the big bang and thus we will reconcile gravity and relativity and relativity and quantum.
Finally reconcile Newton and Einstein and general relativity with quantum relativity?
But I will never present what I think as someone who dictates a dogma, but rather as someone who finds some point to hold on to in an ocean of uncertainties that I try to describe while I am part of it and evolve with it.