On Sunday, as prominent Democrats began endorsing Vice President Kamala Harris for president, criticism from the political right quickly followed. Will Chamberlain, a conservative lawyer who previously worked on Ron DeSantis’s presidential campaign, took to social media to express his belief that Harris is unfit to be President because she does not have biological children. Chamberlain argued that Harris becoming a step-parent to older teenagers does not qualify as having children of her own, claiming that she lacks a personal stake in the future and the experience of raising children.
It’s important to remember that if Harris were to be elected, she would not be the first American president without biological children. Past presidents such as George Washington, James Madison, Andrew Jackson, James Polk, and James Buchanan did not have biological children of their own. Warren Harding, although having a child out of wedlock, publicly denied paternity, only for DNA testing to confirm his fatherhood almost a century later.
The idea that someone without children cannot understand the concerns of parents and families is flawed. Empathy and compassion are qualities that allow individuals to relate to the needs and challenges of others, even if they do not share the exact same experiences. It is unfair and un-American to suggest that a politician’s commitment to families and the country’s future is diminished because of their parental status. Being a parent does not automatically make someone a better or more caring person.
Furthermore, this criticism is hurtful to those who, despite not having children of their own, play significant roles in the lives of children around them. Many individuals invest time, love, and resources into nurturing and supporting children, regardless of whether they are biologically related. Additionally, this argument is especially painful for those who desire to have children but are unable to do so.
This tactic of attacking politicians based on their parental status is not new. Some Republicans have resorted to labeling the Democratic Party as the party of “childless cat ladies” in an attempt to uphold the image of the G.O.P. as the pro-family party. However, it is crucial to recognize that true support for families goes beyond superficial characteristics and extends to policies and actions that benefit all families, regardless of parental status.
In conclusion, it is essential to move away from divisive and discriminatory rhetoric that seeks to undermine individuals based on their personal lives. Empathy, compassion, and a dedication to the well-being of all citizens should be the qualities we value in our leaders, regardless of whether they have children of their own. Let us focus on policies and actions that promote inclusivity, understanding, and support for all families in our society.
