The head of Instruction number 19 of Madrid has initiated preliminary proceedings for two alleged crimes of tax fraud and an alleged crime of forgery in a commercial document against Isabel Díaz Ayuso’s partner, Alberto González Amador.
Along with him, a “possible front man” is also being investigated, Maximiliano Eduardo N. G., and the three Sevillians he had used to make false invoices, David Herrera and the Carrillo brothers. The judge initiates this case after the complaint from the Prosecutor’s Office.
The investigation focuses on the alleged criminal evidence regarding facts related to the Corporate Tax corresponding to the years 2020 and 2021 and an alleged crime of falsification of a commercial document due to invoices having been provided that do not correspond to services actually provided and contributed with the purpose of reducing the tax amount to be paid.
In the order, the judge reasons that supposedly and ‘as a consequence of these fraudulent behaviors, González has stopped paying a fee of 155,000 euros to the state Public Treasury for the 2020 Corporate Tax and for the 2021 corporate tax, a fee of 195,951 euros, crimes punishable in article 305.1 of the Penal Code in medial competition with a crime of forgery in a commercial document, of article 392.1.
The Madrid Prosecutor’s Office relied on a report from the Tax Agency, which attributes to Alberto González Amador two possible crimes of tax fraud in corporate tax for presenting false invoices through external companies to obtain tax benefits through the Maxwell company. Cremona Engineering.
The Prosecutor’s Office states in its complaint that “it has been detected that said company, with the purpose of evading its taxation, given the increase in the volume of business that it had experienced in those years, carried out certain behaviors, with the sole purpose of reducing said taxation, improperly deducting expenses under invoices that do not correspond to services actually provided.”
To do this, it used companies from Mexico or Costa Rica that issued invoices for work not performed. Thus, along with González Amador, the Prosecutor’s Office demanded that the four administrators of the companies that had falsely invoiced the company be named as investigated.
