The public company Tersa maintains the request to archive the judicial case initiated, alleging correct regulatory compliance after the judicial declaration that took place today by the competent authorities in the Court of Badalona. After the appearance and their respective statements, Tersa highlights that valuable elements that confirm the proper functioning of the plant have been provided and reiterated.
According to sources from the incinerator, both the declaration of those responsible for the Administration and the Civil Guard technicians have once again verified compliance with the emission and air quality limit values ??in the environment, which consequently accredit correct operation. of the installation. Specifically, Civil Guard technicians have stated, responding to questions from the Prosecutor’s Office, that “the PVE emission data does comply with the regulations.”
The statements, the company continues in a press release, reaffirm the rest of the investigations and expert analyzes in which it has already been determined, by the environmental administration, expert experts and academic centers, that the facility complies with the applicable legislation and that It does not represent a risk to the environment or the health of the surrounding area.
According to Tersa, among the studies carried out during this research period by relevant and independent authorities is the report issued by the University of Barcelona, ??that of the Polytechnic University of Catalonia, the report of the Public Health Agency of Barcelona, ??that of the Center Higher Scientific Research Institute (CSIC) and the College of Engineers of Catalonia.
Additionally, Tersa has recently also renewed the integrated environmental authorization (AAI), during the review of which the competent administrations have again certified compliance with the regulations and standards established by the regulatory bodies on the matter.
After six years of investigations, and the latest statements in court, given that no regulatory violation has been identified that justifies the continuation of the process, Tersa’s defense reiterates its request for dismissal and filing of the case before the investigating judge of the case. .