Vice President Kamala Harris recently made a decision that raised eyebrows among voters from both parties – she chose to skip the Alfred E. Smith Dinner. This event is known for bringing people together in a spirit of joy and unity, allowing politicians to share a laugh, even at their own expense.
The Al Smith dinner has a history of providing insights into the personalities of candidates. For example, in 2016, President Trump displayed a surprising ability for self-deprecating humor. He joked about the media bias against him by referencing Melania’s speech that was similar to one given by Michelle Obama. Trump’s ability to laugh at himself and Melania’s gracious response garnered bipartisan applause.
The dinner is named after Al Smith, known as the Happy Warrior, who served as governor and ran for president in 1928. Despite facing anti-Catholic bigotry, Smith made significant contributions to American politics. Issues important to Catholics, such as pro-life values and religious liberty, continue to influence elections today.
The tradition of politicians coming together at the Al Smith dinner dates back to John F. Kennedy and Richard Nixon in 1960. Americans appreciate leaders who can show a sense of humor, as it demonstrates a relatable and human side to them. The last presidential candidate to decline the invitation was Walter Mondale in 1984, and history shows that it did not bode well for him.
In a time when political tensions run high, events like the Al Smith Dinner can serve as a reminder of the importance of unity and civility in politics. It provides a platform for leaders to set aside their differences, share a laugh, and come together for a common cause. Perhaps Vice President Harris missed an opportunity to show her lighter side and connect with a broader audience by declining the invitation. As history has shown, embracing moments of levity and camaraderie can leave a lasting impression on voters.