Tip us on sms 1224 (alm. TEXT rate), or send an email to 1224@eb.dk. You can also choose to fill in the form below.
E-mail: Name: Tel. No: Select image or video (5 mb) Send Upload photo/video Close
Thank you for your submission
not one of them. The editors
It was an error – please try again
please Remember to fill in all the fields and attached material must not fill more than 5 mb.
If the problem remains, you can submit the tip on the sms to 1224 (alm. sms tariff), or via email to 1224@eb.dk.
Submit material
One of the largest taxiselskaber, Dantaxi, risk resolution.
according to an access from the Færdselsstyrelsen, as the Extra Blade has got.
Last year acquired the private equity fund Triton Dantaxi. Through a number of companies end up the ownership on the Jersey.
See also: How to shop taxi-the king with the permissions
But of taxiloven it appears that the owners of a Danish taxi company must be resident in the EU or in a EEA country. Jersey is either an EU – or an EEA country.
Why have the Extra Magazine asked Færdselsstyrelsen, how it can be done, to Dantaxi have the right to operate the taxi company in Denmark.
There is not yet fallen, the judgment in the case, but by inspection it appears that Færdelsstyrelsen has prepared a draft, which is the ‘agency’s interpretation of the provision on the present basis,’ as it sounds in your reply.
the draft says:
‘It is Færdselsstyrelsens assessment, that the requirement in taxilovens § 3, paragraph. 2 no. 2 and § 5, paragraph. 2, no. 2, implies that all natural persons who indirectly are the owners of Dantaxi-the companies must be resident in the EU or the EEA.’
See also: tax Havens-the company behind Denmark’s largest taxi company
‘It is also the agency’s assessment that ejerkravet applies to both in re-lation to the individual limited partners and general partners in the following companies, which indirectly owns Dantaxi companies: Triton Smaller Mid-Cap F&F No. 2 L. P., Triton and Smaller Mid-Cap Fund L. P., Triton and Smaller Mid-Cap F&F L. P. and TFF (TSM) L. P.’
‘This means that the natural persons who, directly or indirectly, are limited partners in the above-mentioned four companies, which must meet the residency requirement, as well as to the natural persons who ultimately, directly or indirectly, exercise management rights as the general partners in the above-mentioned four companies must meet the residency requirement.’
‘Færdselsstyrelsen does not find it established that the Dantaxi companies meet this requirement in respect of all limited partners and the general partner of the TFF (TSM) L. P.’
See also: Taxakonge continues took: Scores every third permission
Færdselsstyrelsen working with to give Dantaxi nine months to remedy the situation. If it happens, will the board pull the company’s taxitilladelser back.
In January could Ekstra Bladet and then Radio24syv tell that Triton had purchased Dantaxi through the companies in Jersey, which will mean that the company can send any proceeds directly in the tax havens. Extra Magazine wrote the first article 29. January 2019. By inspection, it is apparent that Færdselsstyrelsen was on the trail two days before, where the Danish business authority, was asked about its ownership.
the Extra Leaf has been in contact with Dantaxi, having regard to the Triton, where the head of communications Fredrik Hazén not returned. He has earlier in the day stated for b.dk:
‘We will be utterly baffled by a possible reinterpretation of the taxiloven, which can have serious consequences for an investment that is undertaken based on clear direction and constructive dialogue with the Danish authorities.’
