“You are not a victim of anything, the people of Madrid are,” the Más Madrid spokesperson reproached him. “She was already Alberto González Amador’s partner when he decided to defraud. And while they wear masks, they deny the rest of us the right to private healthcare,” Manuela Bergerot concluded.

“You lied, there was a crime. That is indeed savage and not the persecution that you denounce and that does not exist. Stop being victimized and do not be hypocritical,” the leader of the PSOE-M, Juan Lobato, snapped.

The Madrid Assembly debated this Thursday, with the greatest of crudeness, about the tax crimes recognized by the partner of Isabel Diaz Ayuso and that the president of the Community of Madrid denied yesterday in a press conference in which it was established the great victim of “political persecution” after it became known that the Treasury is investigating his Alberto González Amador for two crimes of tax fraud and one of document falsification.

Despite Ayuso’s explanations, presented with less force than the day before when it was still unknown that her partner had admitted to two tax crimes to try to reach an agreement, the opposition has tried to corner the Madrid president, whom it has repeatedly asked for her resignation. . “We are tired of scandals, resign, resign once and for all,” Bergerot insisted, accusing the popular leader of “being at the center of everything” and favoring her family. “You just have to connect the dots,” he said.

Lobato, for his part, has declared that “the damage that Koldo does to the PSOE” worries him less than the damage that “it does to democracy” and that is why he has defended that his party responds “immediately and forcefully, collaborating with Justice, no matter who falls, and supporting all investigative commissions. For Lobato, corruption is responded to “without victimhood.” “There are no hunts, there are no chases, there are no wild Treasury inspections… But what is this? Yesterday you lacked this to end up saying that Pedro Sánchez owes money to his boyfriend, Mrs. Ayuso,” he launched .

Despite the attacks, and supported by a group that has wildly applauded all her interventions, Ayuso has insisted on classifying all the accusations made about her and her partner as “false” and has used the “and you more” to charge against both parties of the Government – Más Madrid is in alliance with Sumar – due to the cases that affect some of its ministers and former ministers.

“They ask for my resignation as they do not, for example, ask for the resignation of either Mr. Torres or Mrs. Armengol, trying to cover up for me, trying to ask for a resignation when what you should do is stop covering up that scandal” (.. .) “And meanwhile, they leave Mr. Illa, increasingly suspected of having distributed millions of euros without justification, in the same place, asking for my resignation… Are you going to ask Mr. Illa for explanations?” she defended herself, visibly irritated by the drip of information that affects your partner.

And in the face of the opposition leader’s harsh attacks, Ayuso has criticized her, saying that “she is much worse than the dead duck they put at the Mascletá crime scene, making a fool of herself as always.”

Despite the protective shield that the PP of Madrid is deploying around Ayuso, the opposition believes they have found a way to wear down the president of Madrid and have even extended the scourge of corruption to Ayuso’s predecessors in the presidency of the Madrid’s community. “The regional president is the same as the former Madrid leader Esperanza Aguirre, Francisco Granados or Cristina Cifuentes – all of them with abrupt political ends due to the Gürtel, the Púnica and the false master’s degree -… she is on to other things (…)” Here there is only one president who has lied and one party that is corrupt in Madrid: yours, Mrs. Ayuso. Therefore, resign,” Más Madrid and PSOE have intoned in unison.