Tamara Falcó's lies due to the controversy with her wedding dress: "She had a long-term contract"

Tamara Falcó continues to search for a fashion firm that will be in charge of designing the wedding dress that she will wear at her next wedding with Íñigo Onieva. The controversy continues to monopolize hours and hours of gatherings due to the constant contradictions on television around the breaking of her contract with Sophie et Voilà, which she was going to do initially.

There are only a few weeks left and time is on the horizon for the couple, who have had to respond to the media on several occasions in recent days. The Sálvame program has been one of the last to have collected statements from Tamara, assuring that she is “fine” and that she is “very eager” to finally find whoever she designs her wedding dress.

The Telecinco space has echoed the words of Tamara Falcó in El hormiguero, where she is a regular collaborator. Despite not having been able to project images of the program because it belongs to Antena 3, Sálvame viewers have been able to see first-hand Falcó’s position on a controversy that has directly affected him.

It is there where the program La fábrica de la tele has caught Tamara in a new resignation, when contradicting herself by who broke the contract with Sophie et Voilà. “I was very sad and my lawyer asked me: ‘do you like the dress or not?’ I didn’t have to marry him,” Falcó initially said in El hormiguero.

The collaborator adds just after that “then there was a conversation between lawyers, and the next thing I know is the statement.” Some statements that contrast with the initial insistence of Falcó and Onieva that they had found out about the end of their contract through the press.

Another lie uncovered by Sálvame is the one related to whether Tamara was going to charge for wearing the dress. “I had a long-term contract with Sophie et Voilà because I was going to be their image for one year, extendable to two, but I did not charge for my wedding dress, but for the global image contract.” Just two days ago, it was assured in the same program that the designers had not paid “not a penny” to Falcó, finding a new contradiction among so much informative chaos.