J. K. Rowling’s temperance in the face of the proliferation of trans laws that redefine the term “woman” is driving the political class that supports the queer religion and that, in general, only knows how to counteract the writer by accusing her of being a hater.
In Scotland, where a Hate Crimes law has just come into force that muzzles any dissident of the fashionable cult, former Prime Minister Nicola Sturgeon (who did not want to apologize for transferring a violent and harassing trans prisoner to a prison in women) has called Harry Potter’s mother a “destroyer of women” for continuing to call men those who biologically are men.
The police, due to allusions, have been quick to clarify that they will not pursue the renowned writer for political incorrectness on Twitter, although they have shortly had to come forward with an ambiguous double denial of the type… “we will not treat it as a no- hate crime.” The laughter and jokes did not wait long.
Reading her on Twitter you can see that she dedicates time and patience to responding to even the most offensive and gratuitous comments. Especially those who accuse her of avoiding the question of what it means to be a woman, the same one that Yolanda Díaz left blank in the middle of the electoral debate.
“Being a woman is not a mystical state of being, nor is it measured by how well one adapts to sexist stereotypes. We are not the creatures that porn or the Bible says we are. Being a woman is not, as the transfeminine Andrea Chu Long wrote, ‘an open mouth, an expectant ass, blank, very blank eyes’, nor are we an afterthought of God, arising from Adam’s rib…” .
Rowling’s response on Twitter follows; It is long and understandable. And the reaction of the person who questioned her was very illustrative: “There are a lot of words here, I’m not going to read the whole fucking text. But it seems weirder to me to dedicate myself to doing all that than to simply believe that trans women are women.”
