Three months after Daniel Sancho’s entry into prison, after confessing to the murder of Edwin Arrieta in Thailand, there was little information about the whereabouts of Silvia Bronchalo. The accused’s mother remained in the Asian country for several weeks, periodically visiting Daniel, until returning to Spain at the beginning of October.
Since then, there has been speculation about the reasons that led Bronchalo to stop visiting his son, and that they were due to the lack of relationship with his ex-partner and Daniel’s father, the actor Rodolfo Sancho. In this way, the interpreter became the protagonist of the legal issues in the case, leaving Silvia on the sidelines and provoking her anger at this decision.
Given this information, Daniel Sancho’s mother has decided to break her silence through her lawyers, addressing a statement to the media about what is being published about the investigation and, in particular, about Bronchalo’s relationship with Rodolfo. The Telecinco program TardeAR has exclusively covered its content.
The document begins by transmitting “its most sincere condolences to the family of Edwin Arrieta,” and then moves on to explanations. “The concern of our representative focuses solely and exclusively on the well-being of his son. In no way has he attempted to hinder or interfere with this defense, and his entire intervention has focused on seeking the best options for his son,” the statement reads. .
“Our client has always stayed away from the media, and has never issued a statement or transmitted any information to any media,” Silvia Bronchalo’s lawyers clarify, adding that “there is a clear omission to adequately verify the accuracy of the information” about her, “that is directly and profoundly affecting her rights and honor.
“We urge the media not to broadcast and disseminate any information, under any circumstances, about our client, regarding her current relationship with Rodolfo Sancho and the legal defense that her son Daniel Sancho is receiving in Thailand. and in Spain,” the statement concludes, reserving “the right to file legal actions in defense of its interests.”
